The future relationship between KIIT and its Nepali students depends on several factors, including legal actions, policy changes, and institutional accountability. Here are a few possibilities:
1. Improved Relations and Reforms
- Policy Changes: If KIIT takes strict actions against those responsible and implements anti-harassment policies, Nepali students may feel safer.
- Diplomatic Pressure: The Nepalese government is already involved. Continued pressure may ensure better treatment of Nepali students.
- Student Support Initiatives: KIIT may introduce helplines, grievance redressal systems, and student-led committees to prevent future incidents.
2. Temporary Normalization, But Long-term Distrust
- Superficial Damage Control: KIIT may offer apologies and reinstate students to restore its reputation, but underlying biases might persist.
- Lack of Real Action: If authorities fail to punish those responsible, fear among Nepali students may linger.
3. Continued Harassment and Tension
- Hostility from Local Students or Staff: If no cultural sensitivity training is introduced, tensions might continue.
- Unresolved Grievances: If Nepali students feel justice wasn’t served, protests and distrust could persist.
4. Decrease in Nepali Student Enrollment
- Parents’ Concerns: Many Nepali students might choose other universities due to safety concerns.
- Reputation Damage: If international media continues covering the incident, KIIT may struggle to regain trust.
What Needs to Happen for Real Change?
- Strict legal actions against those involved.
- An independent committee to oversee student grievances.
- Clear policy changes promoting inclusivity and safety.
- Assurance from both KIIT and the Indian government for the protection of Nepali students.
If KIIT genuinely learns from this incident and implements strict reforms, relations could improve. However, if they only focus on PR damage control, tensions may persist.
Social Plugin